So it seems like Manny is all I write about these days, but if you’ve read any sports website lately, that’s all they write about too. It seems the Giants are back in it…but then their GM set the expectation today that they’re really not in it for the money or length people thing.
I recently wrote that Manny’s money could be used elsewhere, but today I was trying to put myself in Manny’s shoes. The baseball world is scared of Manny being disappointed in the price or years, and therefore quitting in the middle of a contract. The only way it seems that Manny is really going to be excited about his new deal is if he truly gets 4 years. That’s what he wants, and if he gets it (even he knows it’s a little bit of a stretch), then he will start happy (I’ll come back to finishing happy later). I know when I was looking for a job a few years ago, I had my number, and when they gave it to me, I went in happy and was ready to work. There were higher expectations because it was a higher number than they initially wanted to give, but I did good work, and they weren’t disappointed in the end.
So here’s the question, how can the Dodgers safely give Manny 4 years? I don’t think the real issue is money here. 25 mil for 4 years will pay itself off if the Dodgers get to the playoffs all 4 years. Great article on SI.com on how Manny is one of the winningest players of all time. Manny will bring people to the stadium, so the cost can be there.
The concern for the Dodgers is two-fold. One his age. He is 36. At 40, how bad will his defense be? Second, what happens if he is sick of LA after 2 years and wants out. Then what?
So how do you compensate for these two? Regarding age, you are limited. He hasn’t had a lot of injuries, but he has had some. You can’t really move him around the diamond, so he’ll still be in left field.
Regarding liking it in LA, that’s a wildcard because anything could change the circumstances. If the fans turn on him because the Dodgers aren’t winning, or Manny is in a slump, then he may want out too.
The key factor here is that both sides need the opportunity to change if circumstances change. I see the value of the Dodgers holding at least a limited trade clause if they need to trade him. The problem then becomes the 25 mil per season.
Go with me on this one. A 4 year deal worth 100 mil. After year 2, and for every year after that, there is the ability to walk away for both sides. It could be an opt out for Manny, or a cessation of contract for the Dodgers. It will be hard for Manny to get 25 mil anywhere else as he ages, so there is incentive to stay. For the Dodgers, they have an out if he doesn’t want to stay.
From Manny’s point of view, he won’t want to be dumped if he doesn’t want it. Therefore, perhaps there is language that the only way the Dodgers can dump him is if he mutually wants out, he was injured and missed a certain number of games, or if there are at least 2 “incidents” during the year that lead to voiding of the contract. These would be sticky to define, but I’m talking injury to Dodger staff or media, sitting out games due to “false injury,” etc. (Basically similar to what happened in Boston.)
The other option I thought about would be if the money somehow rolled forward based on the first 2 years. Say it is a 4 year deal worth 100 mil, but if the Dodgers make the World Series the first year, he gets say 35 mil. Similar the second year. The Dodgers would have more money due to the World Series attendance, and it would pull money off the 100 mil in case there needed to be a trade in years 3 or 4.
Bottom line, Manny wants guarenteed money, but even he knows circumstances can change. I really do think he wants to play for the Dodgers, so I bet he’d be more flexible on these finer details if he really does get 4 years and 100 mil.
Let me know your thoughts. I think we need to help Ned with some options here to help get this deal done.
Tags: Manny Ramirez, Ned Colletti





Entries (RSS)